By Duke Medicine News and Communications
DURHAM, N.C. -- In one of the first studies to dissect how
the important cancer gene RAS
behaves during tumor development, researchers at the Duke Comprehensive Cancer
Center have discovered that initiating cancer and
maintaining its growth are very different processes.
Their study, published in the Nov. 15, 2005, issue of the
journal Cancer Cell, addresses a longstanding belief that
cancer cells become "addicted" to the cancer-causing gene
RAS
and cannot grow without it. They found that while RAS is indeed
important for promoting the start of a tumor, tumors rely on
RAS far less once they are established.
"Once tumors are established, the cancer takes on a life of
its own" said Christopher Counter, Ph.D., associate professor
of pharmacology, cancer biology and radiation oncology and the
study's principal investigator. "This study shows that once a
tumor has created its own neighborhood, it is much easier for
it to keep growing."
The results could alter the development of cancer therapies
now aimed at inhibiting RAS, said the researchers.
Counter and graduate student Kian-Huat Lim, Ph.D., studied
the role of RAS, a gene that, when mutated, is a key player
early in the complex series of events that lead to cancer. An
aberrant form of RAS is found in nearly all pancreatic cancers,
half of colon and thyroid cancers and one-third of all lung
cancers, among others. The gene has been found to turn on
numerous pathways in a cell that lead to abnormal changes in
cell shape, its ability to grow independently, resist the
normal process of cell death, and recruit new blood supply to
the tumor.
But the Duke researchers wanted to understand the role of
RAS once the tumor is already established and growing, the
point at which cancers are diagnosed and treated.
"A lot of research has gone into understanding what it takes
to start a tumor," Counter said. "We wanted to know what it
takes to keep a tumor going and perhaps, then, what it takes to
make it stop."
So, the scientists designed a series of experiments using
human cells growing in the laboratory. They used a combination
of molecules that selectively activated one RAS pathway at a
time while turning off the main RAS signal. The experiment was
similar to turning off a water main, then individually opening
one downstream water valve at a time to see whether it alone
could supply enough water for a town.
In normal cells, they found that tumors did not form unless
all of the RAS pathways were activated. However, tumors that
were already established no longer needed most of the functions
of RAS, except one. The required signal is called AKT, a factor
that allows cancer cells to avoid cell death.
"What we found is that once cancer cells get going, they set
up their own neighborhood of feeder cells that can supply a lot
of what the tumor needs drive tumor growth," Counter said. "If
tumor cells lose some of these growth signals, the cells in the
tumor microenvironment can pick up the slack and keep tumors
going."
This finding clarifies the commonly held notion that cancer
cells become completely "addicted" to RAS and cannot grow
without it. The Duke researchers were able to show that only
one arm of RAS signaling, the AKT pathway, was critical to
maintaining the growth of established tumors.
"AKT appears to be a linchpin for RAS oncogenic activity in
established tumors," said Counter. "There is already active
interest in AKT inhibitors, and this finding certainly
underscores its importance."
In addition, the study demonstrates the critical role of the
tumor neighborhood or "microenvironment" in maintaining active
tumors. The tumor microenvironment contains a network of cells
and blood vessels that support the growing tumor. The Duke team
demonstrated that the tumor microenvironment can substitute for
some of the RAS functions, making tumor cells less reliant on
the presence of activated RAS.
"Our work shows that tumors behave much differently once
they are established," said Counter. "Since cancers are treated
once you already have a tumor, we need to understand how tumors
keep growing, which appears to be a different question than how
tumors get established."
The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute.